pic 1

Top Kenya Tea Buyer Cargill Exits Market

by with No Comment Agri-businessBusiness idea

                                              Implications for the Industry

The major decision by Cargill, one of the biggest agribusiness corporations in the world, to withdraw from the Kenyan tea market has caused some controversy among the local tea industry. For many years, Cargill was a significant buyer of Kenya’s tea, which generates more than $1 billion in foreign money yearly and is the nation’s top agricultural export. Its departure signifies a significant change in the dynamics of Kenya’s tea sector, which has traditionally played a significant role in the nation’s economy. What, however, does Cargill’s exit signify for Kenya’s tea growers, the sector as a whole, and the future of agriculture in the nation?

The Function of Cargill in the Kenyan Tea Sector

Cargill joined the Kenyan tea market as a major importer and exporter, obtaining the product from the vast network of huge estates and smallholder producers in the nation. Over time, the business grew to be a major exporter of Kenya’s specialist teas, which are well-known throughout the world for their flavor and quality.

Cargill was involved in more than just purchasing tea in the Kenyan market. By giving farmers access to markets, funding, and technical support, the company also helped to build the local agricultural supply chain. By offering a dependable market for Kenyan tea, Cargill’s activities enhanced the effectiveness and international competitiveness of Kenya’s tea exports.

The Effect on Small-Scale Farmers

Since smallholder tea farmers account for between 60 and 70 percent of Kenya’s tea production, the departure of a major customer such as Cargill raises questions regarding the immediate effects on these farmers. To sustain their livelihoods, these farmers frequently depend on a steady market for their goods. Cargill’s departure raises the possibility of market volatility, which might have an impact on prices and farmers’ capacity to sell their tea.

Kenyan tea prices are extremely erratic and are influenced by weather, exchange rates, and worldwide demand. It may become more difficult for farmers to obtain reasonable pricing for their tea if a major foreign customer like Cargill were to disappear.

Furthermore, the tea value chain, including distribution, logistics, and packaging, may be disrupted by Cargill’s departure, particularly for farmers who have become used to the company’s supply chain network. As the market adapts to the shift, smallholder tea producers would have trouble finding new customers and might see payment delays.

Competition and Market Dynamics

The departure of Cargill also calls into question market concentration and competition in Kenya’s tea sector. Kenya’s tea industry is still competitive despite the company’s exit, as big competitors like Unilever, Lipton, and the East African Tea Trade Association (EATTA) are still active there. Some of Kenya’s premium tea exports may take longer to reach foreign markets because these businesses aren’t necessarily set up to take up Cargill’s market share right away.

Furthermore, Cargill’s departure opens the door for other foreign buyers and businesses to enter the Kenyan tea industry and maybe take a bigger share. Though it also raises questions about whether smaller or less well-resourced firms will be able to help the Kenyan tea business in the same way, this could result in new alliances.

Consequences for the Economy

For Kenya, tea is a vital commodity that greatly boosts both foreign exchange profits and rural employment. Both domestically and globally, Cargill’s decision to leave the Kenyan market is probably going to have an impact on the economy. Tea exports may temporarily fall as a result of the company’s exit, especially to Cargill’s primary markets in Europe and the US, where Kenyan tea has a strong

However, Kenya may witness a transfer of market share that advantages other important firms if the market stabilizes and new purchasers enter the market to fill the void. However, the departure still points to a weakness in Kenya’s reliance on a small number of major consumers for agricultural exports, especially for essential goods like coffee, tea, and flowers.

What Does Kenya’s Tea Industry Have in Store?

The departure of Cargill offers Kenya’s tea industry both opportunity and challenges. For farmers and companies used to collaborating with the multinational, it generates uncertainty on the one hand. However, it gives the industry an opportunity to innovate and broaden its customer base, which might lead to new collaborations, marketing plans, and value-added goods.

To guarantee that the tea business stays competitive on the international scene, the Kenyan government and industry participants must now move proactively. To lessen the impact of such market fluctuations, this entails enhancing the supply chain’s efficiency, making marketing and branding investments, and fortifying ties with a wide range of foreign buyers.

In conclusion

An important chapter in Kenya’s tea sector has come to an end with Cargill’s withdrawal from the country’s tea market. Smallholder farmers and the larger supply chain may face difficulties in the short term, but there is also room for innovation, market diversification, and heightened competitiveness. Stakeholders must cooperate while the business adjusts in order to build a more robust, sustainable tea industry that keeps growing and supports Kenya’s economic expansion.

shamba ikonet pic 5

KEBS Bans Sale and Consumption of Rumate Feed Supplements

by with No Comment Agri-business

                                          The Role of GS1 Standards

The Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) has recently implemented a ban on the sale and consumption of Rumate feed supplements to protect public health. This decision comes in response to serious concerns regarding the safety and quality of these widely used livestock products. The ban aims to mitigate potential health risks associated with these supplements and to ensure the integrity of the food supply chain.

           The Concerns Surrounding Rumate

Rumate feed supplements, designed to improve livestock health and productivity, have faced scrutiny due to reports of contamination and ineffective formulations. Such problems can adversely affect livestock health, which in turn jeopardizes the safety and quality of animal products intended for human consumption. The precautionary ban by KEBS is a necessary step to safeguard both animal welfare and human health.

         How GS1 Standards Can Help

In light of this ban, the adoption of GS1 standards can significantly enhance traceability and compliance within the food and feed supply chain. Here’s how these standards can be beneficial:

        Enhanced Traceability:
GS1 standards provide effective tools for tracking products throughout the supply chain. By implementing these standards, stakeholders can trace Rumate supplements from production to point of sale, ensuring that any banned products are swiftly identified and removed from circulation.

        Standardized Identification:
GS1 offers standardized barcodes and identifiers, such as the Global Trade Item Number (GTIN), which uniquely identify Rumate supplements. This standardization aids in accurate inventory management, facilitating the enforcement of the ban and preventing the distribution of non-compliant products.

       Improved Compliance and Recall Management:
With GS1’s Global Traceability Standard (GTS), businesses can create comprehensive traceability systems that align with regulatory requirements. This enables efficient recall processes, allowing for the prompt removal of non-compliant products and reducing risks to consumers.

       Data Accuracy and Sharing:
GS1 standards promote precise data synchronization across the supply chain, enhancing the reliability of product information. This ensures that all stakeholders, from manufacturers to retailers, have access to consistent and accurate data, thereby improving overall transparency and compliance with the KEBS ban.

     Global Integration:
GS1’s global standards facilitate seamless integration across international markets, simplifying supply chain management for companies involved in imports and exports. This is particularly advantageous for ensuring that all products adhere to local regulatory standards.

      Conclusion

The KEBS ban on Rumate feed supplements highlights the urgent need for stringent controls and traceability in the feed industry. By adopting GS1 standards, stakeholders can strengthen their traceability systems, enhance compliance, and ensure the safety and quality of feed supplements. Implementing GS1 solutions not only addresses the immediate concerns raised by the ban but also fosters long-term improvements in food and feed safety practices, ultimately protecting both livestock and human health.

For more information on how to implement GS1 standards, businesses are encouraged to visit the GS1 website or reach out to local GS1 representatives.

 

Cocoa pic 2

Cocoa farming in Colombia

by with No Comment Agri-business

Increased Global Cocoa Prices Entice Colombian Farmers to Give Up on Growing Coca

Colombia, a country well-known for its colourful culture and breath-taking scenery, has long struggled with poverty and drug trafficking. For many farmers in the nation, the illegal coca plant the source of cocaine has been a profitable but illegal crop for decades. But a recent development a spike in the price of cocoa around the world is changing Colombia’s agricultural environment.

The Explosion of the World Cocoa Market

The rising demand for chocolate and other goods containing cocoa has led to a notable expansion in the worldwide cocoa market in recent years. Farmers all throughout the world are taking notice of the sharp increase in cocoa prices. A number of causes are responsible for this spike, such as supply chain disruptions, the impact of climate change on traditional growing regions, and strong consumer demand in emerging economies.

Because of this, more numbers of farmers are choosing to plant cocoa in an effort to profit from the rising prices. This change offers a viable alternative for Colombian farmers, who have historically been involved in the coca trade because of its profitability.

A Break with Coca-Cultivation
Colombia has long struggled with coca growing, which is frequently the result of financial desperation. Growing coca plants exposes farmers to serious hazards, such as violence and legal ramifications; they also participate in the drug trade. The chance to move away from coca farming and into a more stable and legal market is presented by the increase in cocoa prices.

For Colombian farmers, switching to cocoa farming has various benefits:

  1. Economic Viability: Farmers are discovering that cocoa can be a more profitable crop than coca because of the high prices for the commodity. This financial incentive gives farmers a strong reason to change their priorities.
    2. Legal and Social Benefits: Farmers can escape the social and legal ramifications of producing drugs by abandoning the coca crop. Growing cocoa is an acceptable agricultural activity that promotes global collaboration and trade.
    3. Development and Support Programs: To ease the transition, the Colombian government and a number of foreign organization’s are funding support initiatives. To aid farmers in making the transition, they include offering financial support, infrastructural development, and technical assistance.

Obstacles and Things to Think About

The shift from coca to cocoa is not without difficulties, despite the fact that the increase in cocoa prices presents tremendous opportunities:

1. Training and Knowledge: Compared to coca, cocoa cultivation calls for various agricultural methods. For people who are not familiar with coca farming, this can be a hurdle as cocoa beans require resources and training to cultivate and process successfully.

2. Market Access and Stability: Farmers need to manage quality standards and trade partnerships in order to successfully enter the global cocoa market. Income stability may also be impacted by market changes.

  1. Initial Investment: New crops, equipment, and technology must be purchased in order to transition from coca to cocoa. Without sufficient assistance, obtaining this investment might be difficult for a lot of farmers.
    4. Sustainability and Environment: It’s critical to make sure cocoa production doesn’t harm the environment. It is important to control the shift so that it doesn’t cause deforestation or other environmental problems.

International Response and Government

This shift has received active backing from the Colombian government as well as from foreign organizations like the United Nations and different NGOs. For farmers to make the transition smoothly, programs that offer cash incentives, technical assistance, and market access are essential.
Furthermore, initiatives are underway to implement fair trade methods that will help farmers and guarantee that the cocoa they produce satisfies global quality requirements. With these efforts, Colombia hopes to develop a more resilient and sustainable agriculture industry.

Towards the Future: A New Chapter in Colombian Agriculture

For many Colombian farmers, the recent increase in cocoa prices around the world is cause for optimism. They have the chance to create a more stable and sustainable future as they move away from coca farming. Even with the ongoing difficulties, progress is made possible by the government’s and the world community’s rising support.

If handled well, this change could support Colombia’s overall economic growth in addition to lessening the impact of drug trafficking in rural areas. As cocoa gains popularity, it presents an opportunity to change the agricultural landscape and open up new economic opportunities in one of the most prosperous nations in South America.

 

farmers pic 4

Fires and Drought: The Dual Threat to Brazilian Agriculture

by with No Comment Agri-business

                   Brazilian Farmers Fear Agriculture Is Threatened by Fires and Drought

Farmers in Brazil’s vast agricultural heartland are dealing with an increasingly difficult scenario as drought conditions and ongoing fires endanger both their livelihoods and the nation’s food security. Brazil’s agriculture industry is under pressure due to the combined effects of these environmental catastrophes, which are critical to both the country’s economy and the world’s food supply.

The Crisis Emerges

One of the top producers of agricultural products in the world, Brazil, is currently suffering from a terrible drought and fires that are destroying pastures and crops. Reduced rainfall and dry fields are the results of changing weather patterns and climate change, which have exacerbated the drought in recent years. This has been made worse by a rise in wildfires, which are frequently made worse by dry weather and land-clearing activities.

Particularly heavily hurt are farmers in areas like the Amazon Basin and the Cerrado. Because of the dry circumstances, the fires frequently burn out of control, destroying crops and deteriorating the health of the soil, making recovery even more challenging. Due to the drought, there is less water available for irrigation, which has left farms barren and livestock without enough water and feed.

Impact on the Economy and Environment

These difficulties have significant economic ramifications. Brazil’s economy is based mostly on its agricultural sector, which produces corn, soybeans, coffee, and meat. Farmers’ income declines and food costs rise as a result of lower crop yields and livestock losses. Brazil exports a lot of agricultural products, therefore the effects are noticed outside of its borders. Supply chain disruptions have the potential to impact international markets and drive up food costs everywhere.

The state of the environment is also quite alarming. The deforestation caused by the fires is a significant factor in the global climate system, especially in the Amazon. The loss of forest cover worsens global warming by reducing the region’s capacity to act as a carbon sink and affecting biodiversity.

Farmers’ Challenges and Reactions

Brazilian farmers are attempting to deal with the issue in different ways, but they face significant obstacles. Many are making investments in enhanced irrigation methods and crop types with greater resilience. But these expenditures come with a heavy financial cost, especially for small-scale farmers who don’t have the resources of larger farms.

The issue of government help has been discussed. Despite the introduction of certain measures, such as emergency relief and financial help, many farmers contend that the support is insufficient considering the severity of the problem. More comprehensive measures, like better land management techniques and funding for climate adaptation plans, are demanded in order to address both short-term issues and long-term resilience.

Gazing Forward

The current state of affairs emphasizes how urgently a concerted response is required to address the root causes of the drought and fire crises as well as their immediate effects. This entails putting more of a focus on climate change mitigation initiatives, improved fire management techniques, and sustainable agriculture methods.

Additionally, international cooperation will be very important. Brazil’s role in global agriculture and the interconnectedness of climate issues make cooperation with other countries and organizations a possibility. These partnerships could offer the nation extra resources and knowledge to help manage these environmental difficulties.

To finish, a comprehensive approach is necessary to maintain agriculture and assure food security, especially given the urgency of the situation as Brazilian farmers deal with the devastating impacts of fires and drought. Brazil’s agricultural sector is facing a critical moment in terms of resilience, and farmers, governments, and the international community will need to work together to properly solve these difficulties. The results will not only influence Brazil’s agricultural sector going forward, but they will also have a big impact on the world’s food chains and environmental health.

milk pic 1

Farmgate Milk Purchases Rise 13% in Nine Months

by with No Comment Agri-business

                                 A Positive Outlook for Kenya’s Dairy Industry

With farmgate milk purchases increasing by 13% in the first nine months of the year, Kenya’s dairy industry has experienced a notable uptick in recent months. An important component of Kenya’s agricultural economy, the dairy industry has a bright future because to this expansion. Growing demand, better supply chain dynamics, and heightened trust in the sustainability of the sector are all factors contributing to the growth in milk purchases.

Milk purchased straight from farmers, avoiding intermediaries or processors, is referred to as “farmgate milk.” For local dairy producers, who have historically faced challenges like shifting prices, intermediary’s exploitation, and irregular demand, this increase in purchasing is a good thing. A number of factors have contributed to the 13% increase, including better access to veterinary care and animal feed, as well as better weather conditions that have increased milk output.

The government’s emphasis on enhancing the infrastructure of the dairy industry, such as processing facilities and milk cooling plants, has also been a major factor in the rise. These advancements have reduced post-harvest losses and increased the amount of milk that reaches the market while preserving freshness and quality.

Additionally, the increase in farmgate milk purchases coincides with a rise in regional and local demand for dairy products. Kenya boasts one of Africa’s biggest dairy industries, and its goods are becoming more and more popular in East African markets. Farmers in the nation stand to gain from rising dairy consumption, as steady prices give them a much-needed financial boost.

But there are still difficulties. Farmers continue to deal with problems like volatile market pricing, inadequate rural infrastructure, and high production costs, particularly for feed and veterinary care. In order to maintain the upward trend in milk purchases and guarantee the dairy industry’s long-term growth, these issues must be resolved.

In conclusion, Kenya’s 13% increase in farmgate milk purchases is a positive sign for the dairy sector, helping farmers and strengthening local economies. The expansion of regional markets, enhanced assistance for farmers, and ongoing infrastructure investment position Kenya’s dairy industry for long-term growth and increased milk output self-sufficiency.

farming pic 1

Character Development Through Farming

by with No Comment Agri-business

                                                        Lessons from the Soil

Despite being perceived as a labor-intensive and rural occupation, farming provides much more than just a source of income. It provides a rich environment for character development and personal progress. The experiences that come with farming, whether it is growing crops, rearing livestock, or running a farm, impart important life lessons that mold a person’s resilience, character, and perspective on the world.

Perseverance and patience

Being a farmer teaches you the value of patience. Farming necessitates a long-term dedication to the land, in contrast to many occupations that provide instant results. Farmers frequently wait months or even years for their labors to pay off, from sowing seeds to harvesting crops. Patience and an awareness that achievement is not always instantaneous are necessary throughout this waiting period. Farmers develop a strong sense of grit and perseverance by learning to endure hardships and wait for the fruits of their labor, regardless of crop failures, erratic weather, or market swings.

Discipline and Work Ethics

There is no place for complacency in the duties of farming. From tending to animals in the morning to maintaining equipment or overseeing crops, every day brings with it new difficulties. Farming instills a strong work ethic in people by teaching them to take ownership of their activities and keep their word. The strict daily routine fosters a discipline that permeates every area of life. A farmer learns to show up, put forth a lot of effort, and persevere through difficult times. Success in other professional and personal endeavors is frequently a direct result of these lessons in dedication.

Adaptability and Problem-Solving

Farming has its share of challenges. Farmers frequently deal with unforeseen issues that need for rapid thinking and innovative solutions, such as pests, droughts, equipment failures, and shifting market pricing. One’s capacity for critical thought and rapid adaptation is enhanced by this urge to solve problems. With limited resources, farmers must come up with creative strategies to reduce hazards, safeguard their crops, and increase yields. These qualities adaptability and resourcefulness become extremely essential since they educate people how to face problems head-on and overcome them.

Accountability and Stewardship

A strong sense of care is necessary for farming. In addition to their property, farmers are also accountable for the environment, animals, and occasionally entire towns that depend on their produce. Accountability, the value of nurturing, and the necessity of making choices that benefit present and future generations are all lessons learnt from this duty. Planting, raising, harvesting, and resting are all cyclical aspects of farming that instill an appreciation for the natural world and the value of sustainability. Farmers cultivate humility and a long-term perspective of personal and environmental responsibility because they recognize the interdependence of all living things.

Adaptability in the Face of Misfortune

There are many difficulties in farming, and not all of them are under your control. Farmers are frequently at the whim of uncontrollable factors, such as volatile markets and erratic weather patterns. But they nevertheless get up every day, face these obstacles, and adjust. This fosters resilience and mental toughness. The process includes failure, such a poor harvest or a decline in the market. Farmers understand that failure is frequently fleeting and that perseverance is essential to long-term success, so they learn to get back up, reevaluate, and carry on.

Appreciation and modesty

A sense of thankfulness is frequently fostered by the difficulties and hard work that come with farming. Farmers learn to value the little things, such as the plenty that nature offers, the beauty of a successful harvest, and the fulfilment of a long day’s labor. They come to appreciate the work necessary for survival and understand that success is frequently dependent on circumstances outside of their control. Farmers learn to value their possessions and the labor that keeps them going, and this humility and thankfulness translate into many facets of life.

Interdependence and Community

Farming is not a solitary endeavor. Farmers frequently collaborate with others in their communities, whether through cooperatives, neighborhood markets, or pooled resources. This emphasizes the value of collaboration and mutual reliance. Farmers in rural areas rely on one another for supplies, support, and guidance. This promotes the qualities of cooperation, respect for one another, and teamwork as well as a strong sense of belonging.

In conclusion

Planting seeds and harvesting crops are only two aspects of farming. It is a path of self-improvement that shapes people into more resilient, disciplined, and patient individuals. Character development and the acquisition of useful skills that benefit both the farm and the individual are fostered by the teachings of patience, work ethic, problem-solving, stewardship, and thankfulness that are embedded in the everyday routines of farm life. For those who do it, farming presents a special chance to develop character in the same way as it develops produce.

tea pic 4

The Impact of New Bill

by with No Comment Agri-business

                            Bill Locks Out Tea Farmers from Guaranteed Subsidy Kitty

A contentious bill has recently caused a great deal of anxiety among tea growers, especially those in remote regions, by denying them access to a guaranteed subsidy pool that had been an essential source of assistance. The policy, which received strong support from MPs, has made many members of the tea farming community feel excluded and uneasy about their prospects in the business. In addition to endangering the livelihoods of thousands of smallholder farmers, this shift also calls into question the long-term viability of the tea industry, which is crucial to the agricultural economy.

Background: The Program for Subsidies

The original purpose of the guaranteed subsidy kitty was to provide a safety net for tea producers, especially smallholders, who were confronted with unstable market prices and the unpredictability of agricultural production. The program has long been an essential instrument for maintaining income stability, guaranteeing a minimum price for tea leaves, and assisting farmers in overcoming the difficulties brought on by growing input costs, climate change, and volatile markets. Additionally, the subsidy was viewed as a vital step in guaranteeing food security and bolstering the economic prosperity of communities in areas that grow tea.

The new measure, however, makes several modifications that fundamentally affect how these subsidies are distributed. Farmers will not be able to access the subsidy pool under the new law if they do not meet specific eligibility requirements, such as land size, production levels, and adherence to particular regulatory frameworks. Smallholder farmers, many of whom are already battling a number of issues, such as growing production costs, restricted access to financing, and a lack of modern farming technology, are concerned about this exclusion.

Important Aspects of the Bill

The bill’s main sections basically rewrite the requirements for obtaining subsidies. The subsidy program is no longer available to farmers who have not reached specific productivity criteria or who have less than a specific number of acreage. Critics contend that this strategy is unjust and impractical, particularly for smallholder farmers who already have few resources at their disposal. Due to uncontrollable circumstances including inadequate infrastructure, limited access to expert assistance, and climate variability, these farmers frequently fail to satisfy the stricter new requirements.

A competitive bidding procedure for the remaining subsidy monies is also introduced by the bill. Many believe that this change from a guaranteed support system to one that is more market-driven will further disadvantage smaller, less competitive farmers who might find it harder to compete with larger, better-capitalized companies. The subsidy pool, which was once a lifeline for struggling farmers, can thus turn into a private reserve for those who already possess the means to prosper in the cutthroat market.

Effects on the Industry and Tea Farmers

There may be serious repercussions if smallholder tea farmers are excluded from the subsidy program. Tea farming is a labor-intensive enterprise, particularly in nations where the commodity is a significant export. The majority of labor is frequently provided by smallholder farmers, and their absence from financial assistance may result in lower tea production, lower-quality tea, and eventually lower incomes for entire communities.

Furthermore, the competitiveness of the tea sector as a whole in the worldwide market is threatened by the change in the distribution of subsidies. The sector may lose its position in global markets if smallholder growers are unable to maintain production at competitive pricing, which might have a detrimental effect on the economies of the countries that depend on tea exports. In areas where tea is grown, local economies will suffer, which could have an impact on rural development, employment, and income.

Furthermore, the bill’s features can cause the agricultural landscape to become even more fragmented. Small farmers may be compelled to sell their property or give up tea growing entirely as they are driven out of the subsidy system. A decrease in the diversity of tea farming operations and a concentration of land ownership in the hands of a small number of powerful individuals could result from this.

Going Ahead: Possible Remedies

A number of advocacy organizations have demanded a revision of the law and its provisions in response to the worries expressed by tea farmers. In order to enable smallholders to continue receiving financial assistance even if they do not fulfil all of the new eligibility requirements, there are requests for the government to implement more inclusive criteria for subsidy access. Experts also contend that any changes to the subsidy scheme should take into account the larger difficulties that tea growers encounter, such as their inability to purchase infrastructure, technology, and inputs.

A more well-rounded strategy would include focused assistance for smallholder farmers with an emphasis on increasing sustainability and productivity. Farmers may be able to access the subsidy kitty without being completely excluded if they are given the necessary knowledge and resources to assist them achieve the new requirements. In order to help growers, adjust to the changing environment and increase the effectiveness of their operations, the tea sector also needs more investment, particularly in the areas of research and development.

In conclusion, the new bill’s current shape runs the risk of harming the same farmers it is intended to assist, even though its goal may be to modernize and streamline the subsidy allocation process. The tea business, local economies, and national agricultural policy may all suffer significantly if smallholder tea farmers are excluded from the subsidy fund. For tea production to be viable in the long run and to support the livelihoods of those who depend on it, policymakers must carefully balance reform with inclusivity.

women pic 1

Combating Domestic Violence Through Agricultural Initiatives

by with One Comment Agri-business

                    How Nakuru Women Are Fighting Domestic Violence Through Farming

Nakuru County, located in the center of Kenya’s Rift Valley, is renowned for its thriving farming communities and diverse range of agricultural practices. Although the region is frequently thought of as being home to enormous fields of products like tea, tomatoes, and maize, many women are experiencing a less obvious but no less significant transformation in their life. Here, women are taking charge of their financial futures, claiming their independence, and breaking free from the cycle of domestic violence through farming. In addition to providing for their family, Nakuru’s women are resisting the oppressive power systems that have historically kept them in subordination by raising cattle and crops.

The Intersection of Economic Dependency and Domestic Violence

Nakuru County is not an exception to the widespread problem of domestic violence in Kenya. Women are frequently abused emotionally, physically, and financially in their households in rural areas. Many women are financially reliant on their spouses in patriarchal societies where men are frequently the main providers. Because they lack the resources to leave or demonstrate their independence, their financial dependence can keep them in abusive relationships.

Like in many other parts of Kenya, women in Nakuru frequently depend on their husbands or male family members for financial support. When this support is interrupted or accompanied by abusive or controlling behavior, they are left with few alternatives. It may feel impossible to leave an abusive relationship if you lack the financial means to make your own decisions. However, many are now figuring out how to escape this cycle of violence as a result of the growth of agricultural projects that aim to empower women.

Farming by Women as a Route to Empowerment

Kenya’s economy has always relied heavily on agriculture, and for many women in Nakuru, farming has evolved into a form of resistance rather than merely a means of subsistence. Women are being given the tools and resources necessary to become self-sufficient farmers who raise crops and livestock for financial security through a variety of community-based programs.

The government is collaborating with a number of neighborhood associations and non-governmental organizations to offer training and access to agricultural equipment, seeds, and expertise. In addition to increasing production, these programs teach women sustainable farming practices like crop rotation, irrigation, and organic farming, which guarantee the long-term financial viability of the women’s agricultural endeavours.

Many of these women find that farming gives them a sense of independence, which is essential for escaping the grip of domestic abuse. Women who earn money from farming are able to make decisions on their own and are no longer financially reliant on their abusers. As women are better equipped to obtain healthcare, seek legal recourse, and send their kids to school, their newfound financial independence can serve as a catalyst for broader social and cultural change.

Success Stories: The Impact of Farming on People’s Lives

The community of Maela, which is located outside of Nakuru Town, offers a motivational example. A cooperative dedicated to vegetable cultivation has been established here by a group of women. The women have invested in high-value crops like carrots, kale, and tomatoes by combining their money and expertise. In addition to offering a reliable source of income, these crops have improved women’s standing in their communities.

Farming has been a lifesaver for Sarah, a cooperative member. For years, Sarah’s husband physically mistreated her. She was able to obtain small loans to purchase seeds and farming equipment after joining the cooperative. Sarah’s little plot quickly grew with the help of her fellow female farmers, and she started selling her produce at neighborhood markets. Sarah was able to leave her violent marriage and rent a modest home for herself and her kids thanks to the money she made from her harvest. In her village now, Sarah serves as an inspiration to other women, proving that farming can be a potent means of escaping marital abuse.

Similarly, women have been changing their life by concentrating on dairy production in the pastoralist communities around Nakuru. Small-scale dairy farms are now run by women who earlier had financial difficulties, producing milk for regional markets. In addition to increasing their financial independence, this form of income has changed the conventional gender dynamics in these communities. Women now have a say in decisions pertaining to family planning, money, and even domestic violence as they take on the role of primary breadwinners.

Ending the Cycle: Advocacy and Education

Apart from how farming directly affects women’s lives, campaigning and education are becoming more and more important. In Nakuru County, community initiatives are becoming more and more centered on educating people about domestic abuse and giving women the means to defend themselves. Local NGOs are offering training on legal rights, preventing domestic abuse, and conflict resolution in partnership with social services and law enforcement.

These initiatives are empowering women to report abuse and seek protection by informing them of their legal rights and providing helpful assistance. Because they have the financial and emotional resources to exit a dangerous situation, women who become economically independent through farming are frequently more inclined to take action against their abusers. In addition, women who participate in farming cooperatives have close-knit support systems that enable them to persevere through hardship.

Obstacles Remain

Even while women’s advancement in agriculture is clearly empowering, there are always obstacles to overcome. For many women, growth is still hampered by cultural obstacles, restricted access to financial services, and the effects of climate change on agricultural productivity. Rural women frequently have trouble getting credit or loans, which are essential for expanding their farming businesses. Furthermore, women’s attempts to achieve equality in farming are occasionally thwarted by ingrained gender stereotypes and opposition from male community members.

Nevertheless, the trend of women adopting farming as a tool for empowerment is expanding in spite of these challenges. In order to remove these obstacles and guarantee that women have the resources and assistance they require to thrive, local authorities, governmental organizations, and non-governmental organizations are all playing crucial roles.

In conclusion

Through agriculture, women in Nakuru County are changing their lives and upending the status quo. They are not only enhancing their own well-being but also serving as role models for future generations by becoming resilient and financially independent. These women are pushing gender conventions that have kept them in the background for a long time, establishing healthier, more successful families, and ending the cycle of domestic abuse through farming. Even if there are still obstacles to overcome, Nakuru’s women’s tenacity in the face of hardship demonstrates that, given the correct resources, encouragement, and willpower, they can change their own narratives and fight for a violent-free future.

imf pic 1

Kenya Seeks IMF Help to Reintroduce Carbon Tax

by with No Comment Agri-business

                                   A Step Toward Sustainable Development

Countries are looking into different ways to lower carbon emissions while promoting economic growth as the world struggles with the pressing need to counteract climate change. The carbon tax, a price mechanism intended to incentivize businesses and individuals to lower their carbon footprint, is one of the instruments in this expanding toolkit. In light of this, Kenya, a nation that must balance environmental sustainability with economic progress, is requesting help from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in order to reinstate a carbon price.

This action is a brave attempt to match economic policy with climate goals at a time when climate change is seriously endangering Kenya’s infrastructure, water resources, and agriculture. It also emphasizes the growing understanding that, with the correct policies and assistance, economic development and climate action can coexist.
The IMF’s involvement in Kenya’s intention to reinstate a carbon tax, as well as the wider ramifications for the nation’s economy and climate policy, are all examined in this article.

Kenya’s Need for a Carbon Tax

Like many other nations, Kenya is already feeling the effects of climate change, such as changes in agricultural production, unpredictable rainfall, floods, and severe droughts. Agriculture, the foundation of the Kenyan economy, has been disproportionately affected by these issues, and they are predicted to get worse in the absence of strong climate action. Kenya has created a national climate action plan with aggressive goals for emission reduction and renewable energy, and it has pledged to cut its greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Paris Agreement.

A carbon tax is a monetary instrument intended to lower carbon emissions by charging a fee for fuels’ carbon content. By raising the cost of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas, this tax encourages companies and consumers to switch to more sustainable practices and greener energy sources. Reintroducing a carbon fee in Kenya could accomplish a number of important goals:

Reducing Carbon Emissions: Kenya can accomplish its climate ambitions by offering firms and individuals a substantial financial incentive to lower their carbon footprints through the pricing of carbon emissions.

Finance Climate Adaptation and Mitigation: The money raised by the carbon tax might be used to finance projects that adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change, such as those involving renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and climatic resilience.

Fostering Green Innovation: A carbon tax incentivizes industry to innovate and adopt cleaner, more energy-efficient technology by raising the cost of polluting activities. This, in turn, stimulates the green economy.

Reintroducing the carbon price, however, is a difficult task that calls for thorough preparation and backing from other countries. Public opposition and worries about the tax’s effects on living expenses and economic expansion were among the difficulties Kenya experienced in its earlier attempts to enact the tax. Herein lies the role of the IMF.

Kenya’s Need for IMF Assistance

The Kenyan government understands that a carbon tax can significantly spur climate action, but it must also weigh the wider economic effects. It is believed that the IMF’s participation is essential in helping Kenya create a tax structure that is both efficient in lowering emissions and fair to its people by offering technical know-how, financial counsel, and policy recommendations.

The IMF may assist Kenya with restoring the carbon tax in a number of ways, including:

Development of Policies and Technical Support

Reintroducing a carbon price necessitates carefully crafting legislation to meet climate goals without placing an excessive burden on the populace. Kenya can get assistance from the IMF in creating the carbon tax in the following ways:

Progressive: Making sure low-income households aren’t disproportionately impacted by the tax. This could entail putting policies in place like subsidies for necessities or compensatory cash transfers.

Broad-Based: Choosing the right industries and sectors to be included in the tax and making sure it is adaptable enough to take into account future changes in energy consumption and technological advancements.

Revenue-Neutral or Productive: Assisting Kenya in deciding whether to reinvest the money received from the carbon tax in energy efficiency initiatives, renewable energy projects

Kenya can successfully execute these elements with the assistance of the IMF’s fiscal policy and economic management experience.

Handling the Transition to the Economy

The transition to a low-carbon economy must be carefully managed to avoid negative consequences on employment, growth, and social justice. A carbon tax might raise the cost of energy and transportation, which would affect sectors including manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture. With help from the IMF, Kenya can develop compensating measures to mitigate these effects. For example, it can support green transition projects, which provide funds for the adoption of energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy in important sectors like agriculture, where Kenya could gain from more resilient and clean practices.

Linking Economic Growth and Climate Goals

Kenya must strike a balance between the need for economic growth and climate action. Although Kenya is making progress in areas like renewable energy, there are worries about the potential short-term effects of a carbon tax on economic growth. The IMF can offer advice on how to incorporate climate goals into Kenya’s overall economic plan by:

Promoting Green Investment: Promoting investments in green industries, clean technologies, and sustainable infrastructure, all of which can lead to long-term economic growth and the creation of jobs.

Promoting Public-Private Partnerships: Assisting Kenya in creating frameworks for PPPs that may draw in private investment and further climate goals in sectors like low-carbon transportation, sustainable agriculture, and renewable energy.

Improving Access to International Assistance and Climate Finance

Kenya may be able to obtain international climate money with the IMF’s assistance. This could take the shape of grants, loans, or technical support from institutions such as the World Bank, the Green Climate Fund (GCF), and others involved in development. These monies could support Kenya’s carbon tax implementation and efficient use of the money raised to reach its climate goals.

Furthermore, the IMF can help Kenya participate in international carbon markets where Kenyan carbon credits might be exchanged, creating new sources of income for the nation and advancing international efforts to reduce emissions.

The Wider Consequences of Bringing Back a Carbon Tax

With the IMF’s backing, reintroducing a carbon price may have a significant impact on Kenya’s economy and climate policy.

Strengthening Kenya’s Leadership in the Global Climate

With its ambitious renewable energy projects, including one of the biggest geothermal power plants in the world, Kenya has already made a name for itself as an African pioneer in climate change. Kenya’s standing as a leader in environmental responsibility and sustainable development would be further cemented if a carbon price were implemented successfully, providing other African countries with a template to follow.

Improving Resilience to Climate Change

A sizable amount of money might be raised by the carbon price and used to improve climate resilience. For instance, investments in drought-resistant crops, water management systems, and climate-smart agriculture could help Kenya’s agricultural industry, which is extremely vulnerable to climate change. In addition to lowering emissions, this would assist Kenya in adjusting to the effects of climate change that it is already experiencing.

Encouragement of Job Creation and Sustainable Growth

Long-term economic growth and job creation could be facilitated by a well-designed carbon tax that encourages innovation in clean technologies, renewable energy, and green businesses. Kenya can build a more diversified economy that is less reliant on fossil fuels and more resilient to future energy and climate shocks by concentrating on sustainable businesses.

Encouraging Social Justice

Kenya must make certain that the carbon tax is crafted to safeguard vulnerable groups in order to allay worries about its regressive nature. Revenue might be used to pay for direct transfers, social programs, or subsidies for low-income households that might have to pay more for energy.

In summary: An Important Step in the Direction of Sustainable Development

An important step towards bringing Kenya’s economic and climate goals into alignment is the country’s decision to reinstate a carbon tax with IMF technical assistance. Kenya can lessen its environmental impact, encourage green innovation, and raise money for urgently needed climate adaptation and mitigation programs by putting a price on carbon emissions. The effectiveness of this policy’s design and implementation, however, in striking a balance between social justice, economic growth, and environmental objectives, will determine its success.

Kenya can successfully manage the challenges of this shift with the IMF’s assistance, assisting the nation in meeting its long-term climate goals and guaranteeing inclusive, sustainable economic growth. Other developing countries looking to incorporate climate policy into their economic plans may find inspiration in Kenya’s efforts as it continues to lead Africa in climate action.

potato pic 2

Revolutionizing Potato Farming

by with One Comment Agri-business

                     New Technology Launched in Nakuru to Rescue Potato Farmers

A new agricultural technology was recently introduced in Nakuru County, Kenya, in a ground-breaking move meant to improve the lives of potato growers in the country. Poor yields, pest infestations, and the disastrous consequences of climate change are just a few of the urgent issues that potato farmers are expected to face thanks to this creative approach.

Local agricultural specialists, IT pioneers, and government agencies collaborated to establish the technology, which combines cutting-edge digital technologies with sustainable farming methods. A smartphone app that offers real-time weather updates, disease and pest alarms, and professional guidance on optimal farming techniques is part of the system. It also brings precision farming methods that lower costs and their impact on the environment by assisting farmers in managing fertilizer use, optimizing irrigation, and monitoring soil health.

Drone-assisted crop monitoring, which enables farmers to evaluate the condition of their potato crops from above, is one of the technology’s primary characteristics. By detecting early symptoms of illnesses like late blight, this aerial device helps farmers take preventative measures before a possible outbreak spreads. It is anticipated that using drones will improve overall pest management efficiency and lessen reliance on chemical pesticides.

The system also incorporates data-driven insights that can assist farmers in making better decisions on planting schedules, crop rotation, and resource management all of which lead to increased yields and more environmentally friendly farming methods.

Numerous farmers, policymakers, and agricultural specialists attended the inaugural ceremony in Nakuru, all of whom were excited to witness how this technology could revolutionize the potato industry. Thousands of small-scale farmers in Kenya depend on the potato sector for their livelihoods. However, the industry has encountered several difficulties, such as weather extremes, pests, and shifting market pricing. By giving farmers the resources they need to adjust to shifting conditions and boost productivity, this new technology seeks to lessen those difficulties.

Peter Munya, the cabinet secretary for agriculture, stressed in his speech that embracing technology is essential to reviving the agricultural industry and guaranteeing the nation’s food security. He also emphasized that this program is a component of a broader government plan to support smallholder farmers, who are the foundation of Kenya’s economy, and modernize agriculture.

Many Nakuru farmers are excited to begin utilising the drones and software on their fields, and many have voiced optimism about the new technology. If this idea is effective, it might be expanded throughout the nation, helping farmers in other areas and solidifying Kenya’s standing as Africa’s top producer of potatoes.

This project is a brilliant illustration of how technology may offer long-term answers to some of the trickiest problems confronting the agriculture industry today. Kenya is making great strides to guarantee the resilience and prosperity of its agricultural sector for future generations by providing farmers with the necessary resources.